Linia verde 83-58-08 activă în continuare pentru victimele torturii şi maltratărilor
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL MOLDOVA
14 mai 2009
Pentru toate persoanele din Republica Moldova care au avut de suferit în urma acţiunilor forţelor de ordine în legătură cu protestele de la începutul lunii aprilie 2009, în special cei care au fost supuşi maltratărilor şi torturii: în cadrul oficiului organizaţiei internaţionale de apărare a drepturilor omului Amnesty International Moldova a fost creată şi continuă să funcţioneze o linie verde de colectare şi documentare a acestor cazuri - 83-58-08.
Mai multe organizaţii non-guvernamentale de apărare a drepturilor omului, inclusiv organisme internaţionale au înregistrat multiple încălcări ale drepturilor omului în Republica Moldova pe parcursul şi după protestele de la începutul lunii aprilie.
Pentru societatea civilă din Republica Moldova a devenit evidentă necesitatea unei asistenţe complexe pentru victimele abuzurilor comise de organele de ordine din RM. În acest sens, noi îi îndemnăm pe toţi să ne contacteze şi să beneficieze de ajutor şi servicii ale profesioniştilor în domeniu.
Vă îndemnăm să ne contactaţi la oficiul organizaţiei internaţionale de apărare a drepturilor omului Amnesty International Moldova, la numărul de telefon 83-58-08 şi să ne comunicaţi despre cazul Dumneavoastră.
Noi vă vom face legătura cu profesionişti care vă vor acorda ajutorul necesar, cum ar fi un avocat care să vă reprezinte în instanţă, medici care vă vor acorda asistenţa medicală şi de reabilitare.
Noi îndemnăm persoanele din Republica Moldova să fie activi în apărarea propriilor drepturi. Să ştiţi că puteţi conta pe ajutorul şi asistenţa profesioniştilor în domeniu - avocaţi, apărători ai drepturilor omului, medici şi alţii, aşa ca abuzurile şi încălcările să nu rămînă nepedepsite:
Lipsa de răspundere în faţa legii (impunitatea) naşte fărădelege.
Transmiteţi acest mesaj tuturor celor care au nevoie de sprijin şi ajutor profesionist, cunoscuţilor şi prietenilor Dumneavoastră. Este foarte important ca acei care au comis fărădelegi să fie traşi la răspundere, cei care au avut de suferit să fie restabiliţi în drepturi, iar daunele care le-au fost aduse să fie reparate.
Friday, May 15, 2009
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Europe vs Great War for the Defence of Fatherland (USSR)
I posted previously on the fact that in my opinion it is incorrect to say that the Moldovan communists are not-that-communists, particularly due to their economic policies. I also gave an interview a few weeks ago to Radio Free Europe, Romanian service, suggesting that economic benefits for the ruling party, and hence their economic policies, do not interefere with their ideological program - personal financial gains did not impede them to continue speaking and promoting the idea of struggle of classes, although in a more modern way. One should understand the Moldovan communists are smarter than that, and that its not USSR time anymore.
Thus, comparing the communist party of the USSR with the current communist party of Moldova has to take into account the need to ajust the ideology to its internal strenght and foreign actors. One can not comapre the behaviour of a communist party that came to power through violence and terror becaming strong enough to hold the whole 15 soviet republics in USSR, with a communist party that was temporarily prohibited in Moldova and had to enter the political race again in the middle of 90s'.
The Moldovan communist adaptability might be rather imposed by the current situation. What could they do if they feel strong enough? Lets see the parralels of the USSR and Moldovan communist behaviour after April 7 elections.
- Voluntary arrest and torture of people in Moldova. Wasn'it widely spread in USSR of 20s up to 50s? They "stabilised" their system, clearing up the "other thinking" people and after that maintained their next step of control.
- Intimidate its own people after Moldovan elections. Is it not what USSR communists have done? The country was big and diffcult to control. Moldova is not.
- Intimidating free civil society dealing with democratisation in Moldova. That one, the free civil society focusing on democratisation, did not exist in USSR times for obvious reasons. It could not. The USSR was "the most democratic country in the world" anyway, as the communists stated. Now, after 7 April, the Moldovan communists started to deal with the Moldovan free civil society - fiscal inspections first, what would follow later? Moldovan communists do not close them down, but they paralise them - they are smater than their USSR ancestors.
- Finally, someone muted the following to me - allegedly on April 7, 2009, the National Security Council, chaired by the President Voronin (also Chairman of the Communist Party), with the members of the NSC, decided to prohibit the political parties in Moldova. They voted, but not included this item on the minutes. True or not? See the USSR - one country = one party. And also see what a good number of Moldovan elderly populace stated - over 50% of the country: they stated they only want one party. A fruitful ground for such a decision. Its only a matter of lack of strength for the communists and a matter of Europe and its funds - although, of course there is always a smart alternative, as previously suggested the Moldovan communists are smarter than their USSR ancestors: the Moldovan communists have an excellent example - to form several parties that would support the communists, or to ensure the support of the current ones. Isn't it exactly what Mr. Putin has done in Russia? "Multiple parties", which are in fact wings of one megaparty, like in the USSR, just a bit smater than in the old times...
Moldovan communists are not the communists of the USSR. They are smarter than that, but they are no better. Their economic policies are self-focused, they now hold many businesses, but the had enough examples of "free" economic markets with one party control over it. The money did not change the ideology drasticallym, it adapted it.
Europe and Wuropesation of Moldova so much invoked by the communists? Well, its easy to say one thing to keep a neighbour calm, and after ensuring the neighbour is lenient and forgiving, one can do many other things, not that European after all.
See how on May 9, the communist party of Moldova celebrated the Victory in the Great War for the Defend of Fatherland, that is USSR. They did not celebrate the victory in the second world war, although there were people in Moldova who fought on both sides. Propagating the V-Day as the main communist holliday a la Russe, as FreeEurope put it, shows what the reality is. No need to mention that the communist authorities did not go to the celebration of the Europe's day organised by pro-european liberals, nor the communists organised their own Europe's day celerbation.
Will Europe continue turning a blind eye on that belarussisation experiment right on their door steps? Europeans attempted to suggest to three liberal parties to accept the rigged results of the elections and vote for a communist government. The economic crisis will hit Moldova hard without a Government, they say. That is exactly what Mr. Voronin, the chair of the communists and incumbent Moldovan president sais. Liberals on the other hand have only one choice - not to vote vor the communists. Their voters gave their were tortured and any vote vor the communist party will be a political suicide for any of the three liberals - the voters will abandon them. Their voters also believed the liberals to be the REAL pro-Europeans. A liberal vote for the communists is a vote for that liberal party oblivion. They can't afford that. By now it it looks like Europe left the people of Moldova alone.
In fact there is only one way out of political and then crises - to ensure a joint set of actions to return to normality. After wide-sread torture and heavy misdeeds of the security forces, an EU Rule fo Law Mission to Moldova is in order. The political crisis will not be overcome by voting for the communists - the dialogue will only happen if public media in Moldova will become free, the justice will not be infleuneced by the communis party. These are normal things in any European country. So that is why we expect them to be supported in Moldova. The civil society launched a roadmap out of crisis. Democratic parties selected the ideas out of roadmap and supported them. Its Europe's turn now.
Meanwhile watch the communsts celerbating the Victory day, a la Russe, on the doorsteps of Europe. We live here everyday, at least half of us did not vote for such a future, another good part is already in Europe. Disregard this and you will disregard the reality. There is indeed a moral responsibility ours, of people who beleieve in democracy, of the citiens of Moldova, of political parties - and of Europe!
That's what happened on Europe's day in Chisinau and in communists minds - Victory Day a la Russe 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeUrN6uyWCQ
Victory Day a la Russe 2:
http://www.europalibera.org/video/1619.html
Thus, comparing the communist party of the USSR with the current communist party of Moldova has to take into account the need to ajust the ideology to its internal strenght and foreign actors. One can not comapre the behaviour of a communist party that came to power through violence and terror becaming strong enough to hold the whole 15 soviet republics in USSR, with a communist party that was temporarily prohibited in Moldova and had to enter the political race again in the middle of 90s'.
The Moldovan communist adaptability might be rather imposed by the current situation. What could they do if they feel strong enough? Lets see the parralels of the USSR and Moldovan communist behaviour after April 7 elections.
- Voluntary arrest and torture of people in Moldova. Wasn'it widely spread in USSR of 20s up to 50s? They "stabilised" their system, clearing up the "other thinking" people and after that maintained their next step of control.
- Intimidate its own people after Moldovan elections. Is it not what USSR communists have done? The country was big and diffcult to control. Moldova is not.
- Intimidating free civil society dealing with democratisation in Moldova. That one, the free civil society focusing on democratisation, did not exist in USSR times for obvious reasons. It could not. The USSR was "the most democratic country in the world" anyway, as the communists stated. Now, after 7 April, the Moldovan communists started to deal with the Moldovan free civil society - fiscal inspections first, what would follow later? Moldovan communists do not close them down, but they paralise them - they are smater than their USSR ancestors.
- Finally, someone muted the following to me - allegedly on April 7, 2009, the National Security Council, chaired by the President Voronin (also Chairman of the Communist Party), with the members of the NSC, decided to prohibit the political parties in Moldova. They voted, but not included this item on the minutes. True or not? See the USSR - one country = one party. And also see what a good number of Moldovan elderly populace stated - over 50% of the country: they stated they only want one party. A fruitful ground for such a decision. Its only a matter of lack of strength for the communists and a matter of Europe and its funds - although, of course there is always a smart alternative, as previously suggested the Moldovan communists are smarter than their USSR ancestors: the Moldovan communists have an excellent example - to form several parties that would support the communists, or to ensure the support of the current ones. Isn't it exactly what Mr. Putin has done in Russia? "Multiple parties", which are in fact wings of one megaparty, like in the USSR, just a bit smater than in the old times...
Moldovan communists are not the communists of the USSR. They are smarter than that, but they are no better. Their economic policies are self-focused, they now hold many businesses, but the had enough examples of "free" economic markets with one party control over it. The money did not change the ideology drasticallym, it adapted it.
Europe and Wuropesation of Moldova so much invoked by the communists? Well, its easy to say one thing to keep a neighbour calm, and after ensuring the neighbour is lenient and forgiving, one can do many other things, not that European after all.
See how on May 9, the communist party of Moldova celebrated the Victory in the Great War for the Defend of Fatherland, that is USSR. They did not celebrate the victory in the second world war, although there were people in Moldova who fought on both sides. Propagating the V-Day as the main communist holliday a la Russe, as FreeEurope put it, shows what the reality is. No need to mention that the communist authorities did not go to the celebration of the Europe's day organised by pro-european liberals, nor the communists organised their own Europe's day celerbation.
Will Europe continue turning a blind eye on that belarussisation experiment right on their door steps? Europeans attempted to suggest to three liberal parties to accept the rigged results of the elections and vote for a communist government. The economic crisis will hit Moldova hard without a Government, they say. That is exactly what Mr. Voronin, the chair of the communists and incumbent Moldovan president sais. Liberals on the other hand have only one choice - not to vote vor the communists. Their voters gave their were tortured and any vote vor the communist party will be a political suicide for any of the three liberals - the voters will abandon them. Their voters also believed the liberals to be the REAL pro-Europeans. A liberal vote for the communists is a vote for that liberal party oblivion. They can't afford that. By now it it looks like Europe left the people of Moldova alone.
In fact there is only one way out of political and then crises - to ensure a joint set of actions to return to normality. After wide-sread torture and heavy misdeeds of the security forces, an EU Rule fo Law Mission to Moldova is in order. The political crisis will not be overcome by voting for the communists - the dialogue will only happen if public media in Moldova will become free, the justice will not be infleuneced by the communis party. These are normal things in any European country. So that is why we expect them to be supported in Moldova. The civil society launched a roadmap out of crisis. Democratic parties selected the ideas out of roadmap and supported them. Its Europe's turn now.
Meanwhile watch the communsts celerbating the Victory day, a la Russe, on the doorsteps of Europe. We live here everyday, at least half of us did not vote for such a future, another good part is already in Europe. Disregard this and you will disregard the reality. There is indeed a moral responsibility ours, of people who beleieve in democracy, of the citiens of Moldova, of political parties - and of Europe!
That's what happened on Europe's day in Chisinau and in communists minds - Victory Day a la Russe 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeUrN6uyWCQ
Victory Day a la Russe 2:
http://www.europalibera.org/video/1619.html
Friday, April 24, 2009
First signs of crackdown on NGOs on the day of Solana's visit
On the very day of Javier Solana's visit to Moldova, today, 24 April 2009, the Communist subordinated Fiscal inspectorate of Moldova sent five summons to the Non-Governmental Organisations, members of the Coalition 2009, for free and fair elections that monitored the polls and declared the elections neither free nor fair.
For the first time in their history, the five leading Moldovan NGOs - ADEPT, IPP, IDIS, APEL, CIJ - were asked to present the information about their funding sources in a form that is usually submitted to poltical parties. In that form the authorities asked about all sources of funding - that included funding from political parties and particularly foreign funding. If the NGOs do not comply they would be fined with 3000 Moldovan Lei. However, unltimetely they face blockage of their accounts.
Also today, three newspapers that reported on protests and police violence, received letters from the Ministry of Interior with a request to prove their stories (that would be possible only if disclosing their sources, which is illegal) or to publish a denunciation.
People believe the warnings that the communist authorities would continue the path to an authoritarian regime to be true - after political parties were accused of "coup d'etat" with penal cases started against their leaders, and hence "dealt with", and after intimidating the population, the authorities are now on inconvenient and "non-patriotic" NGOs.
In a reminder to Kremlin's crackdown on Russian NGOs that received foreign funding (particulrly UK), today's request is perceived as an identical act by the Moldovan authorities that copy and adapt the Russian "vertical of power" from their Kremlin partners.
The Russian factor was not only indirectly present in Moldovan post-electoral developments.
Right before President Voronin met EU's Javier Solana he was visited by the Russian Ambassador to Moldova, Valery Kuzmin.
They exchanged views about the Moldovan realities after the April 5 parliamentary elections.
Voronin spoke about "spirit of centuries-old friendship relations and the strategic partnership established between those two countries and peoples."
Right after that acting president Voronin met with Javier Solana, who came from a meeting with opposition, at which he spoke about the need to find a common solution and need for engament (of these parties with communists)...
So you tell me who is "engaged" with whom in this story?
Remember? On April 10 Moscow's Kommersant newspaper reported that Russia sent tear-gas and other equipment to Moldovan communist authorities to deal with expected protests. However, the load with tear-gas AND EQUIPMENT arrived in their IL-76 aircarrier - HOW MUCH, DO YOU THINK, CAN FIT IN A IL-76?
Political parties and their proetsters "dealt with", EU wants the opposition to accept the frauded elections, for over one year I feel we are too much Eastern trouble for someone's attention, we make people in comfortabl offices really annoyed - just like "what do they want?" - giving them one more trouble, creating a strong and sustained impression that is very bad that we are not silent and obedient to "modern communism" - hence, I wonder, atfer all that "trouble" what's next?...
What should actually happen in Moldova for West to react properly?
-------------
http://www.azi.md/en/story/2581
Vladimir Voronin - the Moldovan president in office - met Russian ambassador to Moldova, Valery Kuzmin. The President thanked Russia for its support after April 5, Info-Prim Neo reports.
For the first time in their history, the five leading Moldovan NGOs - ADEPT, IPP, IDIS, APEL, CIJ - were asked to present the information about their funding sources in a form that is usually submitted to poltical parties. In that form the authorities asked about all sources of funding - that included funding from political parties and particularly foreign funding. If the NGOs do not comply they would be fined with 3000 Moldovan Lei. However, unltimetely they face blockage of their accounts.
Also today, three newspapers that reported on protests and police violence, received letters from the Ministry of Interior with a request to prove their stories (that would be possible only if disclosing their sources, which is illegal) or to publish a denunciation.
People believe the warnings that the communist authorities would continue the path to an authoritarian regime to be true - after political parties were accused of "coup d'etat" with penal cases started against their leaders, and hence "dealt with", and after intimidating the population, the authorities are now on inconvenient and "non-patriotic" NGOs.
In a reminder to Kremlin's crackdown on Russian NGOs that received foreign funding (particulrly UK), today's request is perceived as an identical act by the Moldovan authorities that copy and adapt the Russian "vertical of power" from their Kremlin partners.
The Russian factor was not only indirectly present in Moldovan post-electoral developments.
Right before President Voronin met EU's Javier Solana he was visited by the Russian Ambassador to Moldova, Valery Kuzmin.
They exchanged views about the Moldovan realities after the April 5 parliamentary elections.
Voronin spoke about "spirit of centuries-old friendship relations and the strategic partnership established between those two countries and peoples."
Right after that acting president Voronin met with Javier Solana, who came from a meeting with opposition, at which he spoke about the need to find a common solution and need for engament (of these parties with communists)...
So you tell me who is "engaged" with whom in this story?
Remember? On April 10 Moscow's Kommersant newspaper reported that Russia sent tear-gas and other equipment to Moldovan communist authorities to deal with expected protests. However, the load with tear-gas AND EQUIPMENT arrived in their IL-76 aircarrier - HOW MUCH, DO YOU THINK, CAN FIT IN A IL-76?
Political parties and their proetsters "dealt with", EU wants the opposition to accept the frauded elections, for over one year I feel we are too much Eastern trouble for someone's attention, we make people in comfortabl offices really annoyed - just like "what do they want?" - giving them one more trouble, creating a strong and sustained impression that is very bad that we are not silent and obedient to "modern communism" - hence, I wonder, atfer all that "trouble" what's next?...
What should actually happen in Moldova for West to react properly?
-------------
President Voronin grateful to Russia for support
http://www.azi.md/en/story/2581
Vladimir Voronin - the Moldovan president in office - met Russian ambassador to Moldova, Valery Kuzmin. The President thanked Russia for its support after April 5, Info-Prim Neo reports.
, 24 April 2009, 17:59
2009-04-24/15:50/ Chisinau (IPN) According to the Moldovan presidential press service, Vladimir Voronin and Valery Kuzmin exchanged views about the Moldovan realities after the April 5 parliamentary elections.
The president highly appreciated Russia's and its president's moral and political support. Vladimir Voronin insisted this backing matches the spirit of centuries-old friendship relations and the strategic partnership established between those two countries and peoples.
Another topic was the price of the hydrocarbons Moldova receives from Russia, and the opportunity of Russia's offering Moldova a loan to repair roads.
Earlier, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev called 'monstrous' the events occurring in Moldova after the results of the parliamentary elections had been announced. "What happened in our close neighbor, in Moldova, is unfortunately an example of how events can develop in an absolutely unconstitutional way. The footage we saw looked monstrous, when there were attempts to hang flags of another country on the main state buildings, the symbols of a state," Medvedev said in a TV interview.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
The communist are not communists?
Well, see the reality below.
There are two news - one about Czech Prime-Minister Topolanek, in his capacity of EU presidency, and far below another one - Moldovan Communist President celebrating Lenin's birthday.
Now, if "Communists are not really Communists" in Moldova then see that this Lenin's celebration happened right before the meeting with EU Czech Presidency Topolanek today.
-------
Topolanek said, according to the local news portal Unmimedia - I am translating from the parts of the news that were printed in Romanian - quotation:
http://www.unimedia.md/?mod=news&id=10468
„The political crisis in Moldova is unsettling for the European Union. We are not indifferent to what is happening in the Republic of Moldova. At today's meetings I have presented the instruments that exist to solve the crisis - resumption of the dialogue, ensuring a functioning rule of law state, ensuring and respecting freedoms, stop to the attacks and violence, establishing a monitoring commission, in which oposition and international organisations shoould be present. For us the european orientation of the Republic of Moldova matters.”
„Eastern Partenership offers us the posibility to finance different projects, that You consider important. We've also discussed the relations between the Republic of Moldova and Romania. We opt for the resumption of good neighbourly relations. I hope to obtan the normalisation of the relations between these two countries. Between April 27 – 28 there will be an important meeting of the EU Foreign Ministers, where we will discuss the situation in the Republic of Moldova.”
--------------------------
What I would, personally, note is that I can not understand why is there such an excessive focus on Romania. It is rather frustrating here. It is not Romania that actually made things worse in Moldova, let's face it for once.
And to put it even in a blunter way - what's EU interest is, really? The more Communists see that everyone deals with them with soft gloves, the more impertinent they feel. That is a Sovet time legacy, one can still oberve in Russia, to a certain extent.
Now lets just try to see the things through another angle, detach from who takes over whom, lets try one not that usual thought - imagine the EU indeed cares about Moldova, and that it genuinely wants Moldova in the EU, and it also is concerned about Communists' tortures and intimidation of its own populace - well recorded by the human rights activists and lawyers. The more Romanian citizens are in Moldova, the more actually there are EU citizens in Moldova - the argument that with more Romanian citizenship there will be more Moldovan immigrants in EU is rahter a misunderstanding of democraphic realities here. Out of 3.800.000 population of the country, including young and elderly, between 400.000 and 1.000.000 are already working abroad. How can Moldova "produce" more people for migration over night? Moreover, most of those who remained in Moldova are unable to go to Europe, as they have some sort of jobs, not to mention that they will not leave for Europe in times of crisis, when other Moldovans come back spreeading the word about the lack of jobs in times of crisis - the Moldovans are not that stupid.
So if Romanian citizenship is also EU citizenship, and EU indeed cares about the democratic values and is against systemic torture, wants free and fair elections as a wholle, not only on electoral day, why some in the EU would be so concerned about Romanian citizenship and so soft on actual culprits? The Romanian citizenship would b at least the EU citizenship after all. There are other ways to discuss with Romania anyway. That is if EU genuinely wants Moldova to be a part of the EU one day when Moldova is ready, whenever that happens. It is of course an simplified aproach, however I think you all get the picture and under current circumstances, you know, this is just... true.
Why not stopping all the criticism to Romania and concentrating on the causes of the problem - Moldovan leadership that resorted to crashdown on democracy - EU meanwhile concentrating on the need to instate the rule of law in Moldova, insist that Moldova is IMPLEMENTING the European integration - the EU complained about that laready, complaining is good, although ineffective - what about EUs assistance and direct local presence via a specialised mission of support and oversight. Genuinely. Sounds like where are the Moldovans? Think again - the Communists don't care. They proved they don't care about civil society, about any other parties, they are ready to split and antagonise the entire society in the country. They don't care. The only reaction they had was to the EU and US.
Financial assiatnce to them is an intersting thought - however the experience sais that they will milk both West and East for their own needs. Stating that EU can give more money than Russia, which would request obedience from Moldova, is unrealistic in the case of the President who celebrates Lenin, whose son is the most "successful" bunsinessman in Moldova, whose banks are used to transfer salaries for public services, who is alleged to "purchase" sucessful businesses in Moldova through "offers they can't refuse", and finally whose family members publicly stated they would not live in Moldova at the end.
So do they really care about what EU will offer, do they care about Moldova? Or probably their own incentives are more important? Do the math youselves. And finally let's ask ourselves, would it be their first time "milking", promising reform and... lying? Well, surprise - no it wouldn't. See, they did exactly that during 2005-2009. Leasons learned on the EU side - none. After another four years one would say in the West - sorry the results were not as we expected, and what would Moldovans will have to say to that?
See below hte news about the Moldovan not-so-communists - are they not communist? Or perhaps the question is are they Moldovan, in fact? Do their intersts lie with this country?
--------------------
http://www.azi.md/en/story/2489
Chisinau Communists mark Lenin's birthday
2009-04-22/10:46/ Chisinau (IPN) The participants gathered to Lenin's monument from the exhibition center Moldexpo, where they were met with Soviet songs.
The meeting was attended by president Vladimir Voronin, the leader of the Moldovan Communists, Communist parliamentarians and officials.
Vladimir Voronin gave a speech criticizing the Moldovan opposition parties, saying they were like criminal gangs. He condemned the devastation of the headquarters of the parliament and the presidency.
Voronin assured the third victory of the Communists in Moldova will continue their work for the development of the country. He says the key strategic points for the country's development are the European integration, the democratization of society and building a social state.
Deputy premier Victor Stepaniuc has told journalists the Socialist system has proven its political, social and economic viability. The system also had certain drawbacks, but it happened later, in the second half of the 20th century, he said. He says Lenin was a key figure of the left-wing doctrine and his life and works deserve being studied.
Traditionally, Vladimir Voronin handed party-membership cards to several youths, and the participants laid flowered to Lenin's monument.
There are two news - one about Czech Prime-Minister Topolanek, in his capacity of EU presidency, and far below another one - Moldovan Communist President celebrating Lenin's birthday.
Now, if "Communists are not really Communists" in Moldova then see that this Lenin's celebration happened right before the meeting with EU Czech Presidency Topolanek today.
-------
Topolanek said, according to the local news portal Unmimedia - I am translating from the parts of the news that were printed in Romanian - quotation:
http://www.unimedia.md/?mod=news&id=10468
„The political crisis in Moldova is unsettling for the European Union. We are not indifferent to what is happening in the Republic of Moldova. At today's meetings I have presented the instruments that exist to solve the crisis - resumption of the dialogue, ensuring a functioning rule of law state, ensuring and respecting freedoms, stop to the attacks and violence, establishing a monitoring commission, in which oposition and international organisations shoould be present. For us the european orientation of the Republic of Moldova matters.”
„Eastern Partenership offers us the posibility to finance different projects, that You consider important. We've also discussed the relations between the Republic of Moldova and Romania. We opt for the resumption of good neighbourly relations. I hope to obtan the normalisation of the relations between these two countries. Between April 27 – 28 there will be an important meeting of the EU Foreign Ministers, where we will discuss the situation in the Republic of Moldova.”
--------------------------
What I would, personally, note is that I can not understand why is there such an excessive focus on Romania. It is rather frustrating here. It is not Romania that actually made things worse in Moldova, let's face it for once.
And to put it even in a blunter way - what's EU interest is, really? The more Communists see that everyone deals with them with soft gloves, the more impertinent they feel. That is a Sovet time legacy, one can still oberve in Russia, to a certain extent.
Now lets just try to see the things through another angle, detach from who takes over whom, lets try one not that usual thought - imagine the EU indeed cares about Moldova, and that it genuinely wants Moldova in the EU, and it also is concerned about Communists' tortures and intimidation of its own populace - well recorded by the human rights activists and lawyers. The more Romanian citizens are in Moldova, the more actually there are EU citizens in Moldova - the argument that with more Romanian citizenship there will be more Moldovan immigrants in EU is rahter a misunderstanding of democraphic realities here. Out of 3.800.000 population of the country, including young and elderly, between 400.000 and 1.000.000 are already working abroad. How can Moldova "produce" more people for migration over night? Moreover, most of those who remained in Moldova are unable to go to Europe, as they have some sort of jobs, not to mention that they will not leave for Europe in times of crisis, when other Moldovans come back spreeading the word about the lack of jobs in times of crisis - the Moldovans are not that stupid.
So if Romanian citizenship is also EU citizenship, and EU indeed cares about the democratic values and is against systemic torture, wants free and fair elections as a wholle, not only on electoral day, why some in the EU would be so concerned about Romanian citizenship and so soft on actual culprits? The Romanian citizenship would b at least the EU citizenship after all. There are other ways to discuss with Romania anyway. That is if EU genuinely wants Moldova to be a part of the EU one day when Moldova is ready, whenever that happens. It is of course an simplified aproach, however I think you all get the picture and under current circumstances, you know, this is just... true.
Why not stopping all the criticism to Romania and concentrating on the causes of the problem - Moldovan leadership that resorted to crashdown on democracy - EU meanwhile concentrating on the need to instate the rule of law in Moldova, insist that Moldova is IMPLEMENTING the European integration - the EU complained about that laready, complaining is good, although ineffective - what about EUs assistance and direct local presence via a specialised mission of support and oversight. Genuinely. Sounds like where are the Moldovans? Think again - the Communists don't care. They proved they don't care about civil society, about any other parties, they are ready to split and antagonise the entire society in the country. They don't care. The only reaction they had was to the EU and US.
Financial assiatnce to them is an intersting thought - however the experience sais that they will milk both West and East for their own needs. Stating that EU can give more money than Russia, which would request obedience from Moldova, is unrealistic in the case of the President who celebrates Lenin, whose son is the most "successful" bunsinessman in Moldova, whose banks are used to transfer salaries for public services, who is alleged to "purchase" sucessful businesses in Moldova through "offers they can't refuse", and finally whose family members publicly stated they would not live in Moldova at the end.
So do they really care about what EU will offer, do they care about Moldova? Or probably their own incentives are more important? Do the math youselves. And finally let's ask ourselves, would it be their first time "milking", promising reform and... lying? Well, surprise - no it wouldn't. See, they did exactly that during 2005-2009. Leasons learned on the EU side - none. After another four years one would say in the West - sorry the results were not as we expected, and what would Moldovans will have to say to that?
See below hte news about the Moldovan not-so-communists - are they not communist? Or perhaps the question is are they Moldovan, in fact? Do their intersts lie with this country?
--------------------
http://www.azi.md/en/story/2489
Chisinau Communists mark Lenin's birthday
Communist leaders and ordinary citizens, mainly elderly, marked Vladimir Lenin's birthday on April 22 in Chisinau. Lenin was the leader of the Socialist Revolution from Russia in 1917, Info-Prim Neo reports.
, 22 April 2009, 11:47
2009-04-22/10:46/ Chisinau (IPN) The participants gathered to Lenin's monument from the exhibition center Moldexpo, where they were met with Soviet songs.
The meeting was attended by president Vladimir Voronin, the leader of the Moldovan Communists, Communist parliamentarians and officials.
Vladimir Voronin gave a speech criticizing the Moldovan opposition parties, saying they were like criminal gangs. He condemned the devastation of the headquarters of the parliament and the presidency.
Voronin assured the third victory of the Communists in Moldova will continue their work for the development of the country. He says the key strategic points for the country's development are the European integration, the democratization of society and building a social state.
Deputy premier Victor Stepaniuc has told journalists the Socialist system has proven its political, social and economic viability. The system also had certain drawbacks, but it happened later, in the second half of the 20th century, he said. He says Lenin was a key figure of the left-wing doctrine and his life and works deserve being studied.
Traditionally, Vladimir Voronin handed party-membership cards to several youths, and the participants laid flowered to Lenin's monument.
Friday, April 17, 2009
MARTEA ROSIE
Comunistii au gasit un "tag" pentru 7 aprilie pe care il promveaza insistent prin media si populatie, diseminand minciuna si dezinformarea despre realitatile de martea trecuta.
Adresarea televizata a presedintelui in exercitiu Voronin a fost contradictorie - critica vehement si ameninta opozitia dupa care ii chema la impcare, in acelasi fel s-a purtat fata de Romania - ca si cum ai spuipa pe cineva in fata dupa care sa il acuzi ca nu-ti este amic/prieten.
Tratatele nesemnate, mentionate de Voronin, au fost ultima data discutate in iunei 2008 - MAEIE al RM urma sa invitate colegii sai romanai la urmaotoarea runda. Autoritatile de la Chisinau asa si nu au adresata aceasta invitatie. Textul tratatului de baza nici macar nu este negociat pana la capat, iar Romania deja propusee Chisinaului ca acest Tratat sa fie unul EUROPAN, o alta "absenta" acuzata de Voronin. Tratele de frontiere - Romania a recunoscut RM in calitate de succesor al frontierei URSS s trataelor cu aceasta, astfel incat recunoaste frontierele acesteia asa cum au fost, dea ceea sugerand sa seneze un Tratat privind REGIMUL de frontiere. Deci o chestiune tehnica, nu politica, cum vrea sa o prezinte Chisinaul. Iata adevarul.
De "prietenia" PCRM fata opozitie si intimidari nici nu mai spun - comunistii intentionat au intins proceseul de verificare, renumarare, etc ca sa ajungem in Pasti - este o tactica veche URSS, vezi si faptul ca Rusia a planificat atacul asupra Georgiei folosind aceiasi logica.
Deci "martea neagra" - e timpul sa spunem lucrurilor pe nume, despre instigatorii "negasiti" sau eliberati, despre vandalii "intamplatori" - deja stim totul - sa spunem lucrurilor pe nume 7 Aprilie este "Martea Rosie".
Adresarea televizata a presedintelui in exercitiu Voronin a fost contradictorie - critica vehement si ameninta opozitia dupa care ii chema la impcare, in acelasi fel s-a purtat fata de Romania - ca si cum ai spuipa pe cineva in fata dupa care sa il acuzi ca nu-ti este amic/prieten.
Tratatele nesemnate, mentionate de Voronin, au fost ultima data discutate in iunei 2008 - MAEIE al RM urma sa invitate colegii sai romanai la urmaotoarea runda. Autoritatile de la Chisinau asa si nu au adresata aceasta invitatie. Textul tratatului de baza nici macar nu este negociat pana la capat, iar Romania deja propusee Chisinaului ca acest Tratat sa fie unul EUROPAN, o alta "absenta" acuzata de Voronin. Tratele de frontiere - Romania a recunoscut RM in calitate de succesor al frontierei URSS s trataelor cu aceasta, astfel incat recunoaste frontierele acesteia asa cum au fost, dea ceea sugerand sa seneze un Tratat privind REGIMUL de frontiere. Deci o chestiune tehnica, nu politica, cum vrea sa o prezinte Chisinaul. Iata adevarul.
De "prietenia" PCRM fata opozitie si intimidari nici nu mai spun - comunistii intentionat au intins proceseul de verificare, renumarare, etc ca sa ajungem in Pasti - este o tactica veche URSS, vezi si faptul ca Rusia a planificat atacul asupra Georgiei folosind aceiasi logica.
Deci "martea neagra" - e timpul sa spunem lucrurilor pe nume, despre instigatorii "negasiti" sau eliberati, despre vandalii "intamplatori" - deja stim totul - sa spunem lucrurilor pe nume 7 Aprilie este "Martea Rosie".
Обращение Украинского Хельсинского союза по правам человека о ситуации в Молдове
Обращение Украинского Хельсинского союза по правам человека
о ситуации в Молдове
16 апреля 2009г
Украинский Хельсинский союз по правам человека выражает свое беспокойство в связи с массовыми грубыми нарушениями прав человека после событий, случившихся в Кишенеу 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы никоим образом не одобряем какие-либо проявления насилия в ходе политического процесса. Мы также можем понять сложность ситуации, в которой оказались власти Молдовы в ходе событий 7 апреля 2009 года, и сложность решений, которые необходимо было принять для стабилизации этой обстановки.
Однако нельзя найти оправдания той лавине жестокости и насилия, которые обрушила власть на представителей оппозиции, возможно, и перешедших допустимые пределы выражения протестных настроений.
Массовые аресты в основном молодых людей, применение пыток к задержанным, исчезновение людей, осуждение без надлежащей процедуры, без возможности защищаться, под непрекращающимся давлением со стороны полиции - все это нельзя назвать мерами по предупреждению беспорядков.
Как стало известно, двое задержанных в ходе массовых арестов умерли от
пыток и у нас нет информации, что ведется расследование этих преступлений и виновные будут наказаны.
Сотни людей были осуждены судами за административные правонарушения,
не получив ни времени, ни возможности подготовить свою защиту.
Сотни людей были арестованы, и официальные данные в разы отличаются от
тех, которые предоставляют общественные организации. Шестеро людей исчезли бесследно.
Нет оснований не доверять этим данным, особенно на фоне многочисленных
решений Европейского суда по правам человека, который устанавливал
ответственность Молдовы за ту практику нарушений прав человека,
которая в эти дни приобрела концентрированный и массовый характер.
Нас также беспокоят поспешные заявления о политическом заговоре, который якобы лежит в основе событий 7 апреля. Это создает для задержанных еще больший риск
подвергнуться пыткам и жестокому обращению в полиции из-за естественных
попыток власти найти доказательства такого заговора.
Размах массового и организованного государственного насилия далеко превысил необходимость поддержания общественного порядка и напоминает попытки дать острастку всем, кто считает, что имеет право на выражение собственного мнения, на мирные собрания и на политический выбор.
Поэтому мы расцениваем такие действий как нарушение и этих
основополагающих прав.
Как стало известно, в настоящее время в Украине арестованы двое
граждан Молдовы, Габриель Стати и Аурен Маринеску, которых власти
Молдовы требуют выдать в Молдову для уголовного преследования в связи
с событиями 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы полагаем, что выдача этих людей в Молдову будет означать поддержку
и оправдание властями Украины тех массовых нарушений прав человека,
который происходят в этой стране.
Украина, которая является членом Совета по правам человека ООН, не может
допустить, чтобы мир воспринимал ее как адвоката жестокости и насилия по отношению к инакомыслящим. Выдвигая свою кандидатуру в качестве возможного
участника Совета ООН по правам человека, Украина обязалась в своих уважать положения Всеобщей Декларации прав человека, избегать политики двойных стандартов при оценке ситуации.
Являясь представителем Восточной Европы в этом важном международном органе, Украина не должна хранить молчание при массовых нарушениях прав человека в одном из соседних государств.
Мы призываем органы власти Украины осудить массовые нарушения прав человека в Молдове, которые происходили и продолжают происходить после 7 апреля 2009 года, а также инициировать рассмотрение ситуации в Молдове на ближайшей сессии Совета ООН по правам человека.
Мы обращаемся ко всем органам власти Украины не предпринимать никаких действий, которые могут быть расценены как прямое или косвенное одобрение действиям властей Молдовы.
Мы обращаемся к органам власти Молдовы предпринять немедленные меры для прекращения практики пыток, массовых арестов и суммарных судебных разбирательств в связи с событиями в Кишинеу 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы также требуем от властей Молдовы незамедлительно и тщательно расследовать любую информацию о пытках, произвольных арестах и нарушениях прав задержанных.
Мы обращаемся к международным организациям выступить с незамедлительным и решительным осуждением массового нарушения прав человека в Молдове.
Председатель правления Украинского Хельсинского союза
по правам человека
Аркадий Бущенко
Исполнительный директор
Украинского Хельсинского союза
по правам человека
Владимир Яворский
-----------------------------------
Stirea despre aceasta declaratie o gasiti in original, in limba ucraineana daca dati click pe Read More:
УНIАН
[16.04.2009 20:36]
http://human-rights.unian.net/ukr/detail/190474
Правозахисники закликають припинити порушення прав людини у Молдові
Українська Гельсінська спілка з прав людини виражає своє занепокоєння у зв`язку з масовими грубими порушеннями прав людини після подій, що сталися в Кишиневі 7 квітня 2009 року.
Про це йдеться у тексті заяви УГСПЛ, переданої агентству УНІАН.
«Масові арешти, в основному молодих людей, застосування тортур до затриманих, зникнення людей, засудження без належної процедури, без можливості захищатися, під безперервним тиском з боку поліції – все це не можна назвати заходами по запобіганню безладам», - говориться у заяві.
Як стало відомо УГСПЛ, двоє затриманих в ході масових арештів померли від тортур, і у правозахисників немає інформації, що ведеться розслідування цих злочинів і винні будуть покарані.
Також, за даними правозахисників, сотні людей були засуджені за адміністративні правопорушення, не отримавши ні часу, ні можливості підготувати свій захист; сотні демонстрантів були арештовані, при цьому офіційні дані в рази відрізняються від тих, які надають громадські організації; шестеро людей зникли безслідно.
Українські правозахисники заявляють, що у них «немає підстав не довіряти цим даним, особливо на фоні численних рішень Європейського суду з прав людини, які встановлювали відповідальність Молдови за ту практику порушень прав людини, яка в ці дні набула концентрованого і масового характеру».
УГСПЛ також стурбована поспішними заявами про політичну змову, яка нібито лежить в основі подій 7 квітня. «Це створює для затриманих ще більший ризик піддатися тортурам і жорстокому поводженню в поліції через природні спроби влади знайти докази такої змови», - йдеться у тексті заяви українських правозахисників.
Крім того, як повідомляв УНІАН, 9 квітня ц. р. в аеропорту Одеси співробітники міліції, СБУ, прикордонної служби затримали двох громадян Молдови – Габріела СТАТІ та Аурена МАРИНЕСКУ, які підозрюються в організації масових заворушень у Кишиневі. 16 квітня, за повідомленням Генпрокуратури, підозрюваних в організації заворушень в Кишиневі екстрадували з України.
«Видача цих людей до Молдови означає підтримку і виправдання українською владою тих масових порушень прав людини, яка відбуваються в цій країні. Україна, яка є членом Ради з прав людини ООН, не може допустити, щоб світ сприймав її як адвоката жорстокості і насильства по відношенню до інакодумців», - заявляє Українська Гельсінська спілка з прав людини.
Правозахисники закликають органи влади України засудити масові порушення прав людини в Молдові, які відбувалися і продовжують відбуватися після 7 квітня 2009 року, а також ініціювати розгляд ситуації в Молдові на найближчій сесії Ради ООН з прав людини. Також правозахисники звертаються до української влади з проханням не робити жодних дій, які можуть бути розцінені як пряме або непряме схвалення дій молдовської влади.
«Ми звертаємося до органів влади Молдови зробити негайні заходи для припинення практики тортур, масових арештів і сумарних судових розглядів у зв`язку з подіями в Кишиневі 7 квітня 2009 року. Ми також вимагаємо від влади Молдови негайно і ретельно розслідувати будь-яку інформацію про тортури, довільні арешти і порушення прав затриманих. Ми звертаємося до міжнародних організацій виступити з негайним і рішучим осудом масового порушення прав людини в Молдові», - йдеться у тексті заяви УГСПЛ.
о ситуации в Молдове
16 апреля 2009г
Украинский Хельсинский союз по правам человека выражает свое беспокойство в связи с массовыми грубыми нарушениями прав человека после событий, случившихся в Кишенеу 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы никоим образом не одобряем какие-либо проявления насилия в ходе политического процесса. Мы также можем понять сложность ситуации, в которой оказались власти Молдовы в ходе событий 7 апреля 2009 года, и сложность решений, которые необходимо было принять для стабилизации этой обстановки.
Однако нельзя найти оправдания той лавине жестокости и насилия, которые обрушила власть на представителей оппозиции, возможно, и перешедших допустимые пределы выражения протестных настроений.
Массовые аресты в основном молодых людей, применение пыток к задержанным, исчезновение людей, осуждение без надлежащей процедуры, без возможности защищаться, под непрекращающимся давлением со стороны полиции - все это нельзя назвать мерами по предупреждению беспорядков.
Как стало известно, двое задержанных в ходе массовых арестов умерли от
пыток и у нас нет информации, что ведется расследование этих преступлений и виновные будут наказаны.
Сотни людей были осуждены судами за административные правонарушения,
не получив ни времени, ни возможности подготовить свою защиту.
Сотни людей были арестованы, и официальные данные в разы отличаются от
тех, которые предоставляют общественные организации. Шестеро людей исчезли бесследно.
Нет оснований не доверять этим данным, особенно на фоне многочисленных
решений Европейского суда по правам человека, который устанавливал
ответственность Молдовы за ту практику нарушений прав человека,
которая в эти дни приобрела концентрированный и массовый характер.
Нас также беспокоят поспешные заявления о политическом заговоре, который якобы лежит в основе событий 7 апреля. Это создает для задержанных еще больший риск
подвергнуться пыткам и жестокому обращению в полиции из-за естественных
попыток власти найти доказательства такого заговора.
Размах массового и организованного государственного насилия далеко превысил необходимость поддержания общественного порядка и напоминает попытки дать острастку всем, кто считает, что имеет право на выражение собственного мнения, на мирные собрания и на политический выбор.
Поэтому мы расцениваем такие действий как нарушение и этих
основополагающих прав.
Как стало известно, в настоящее время в Украине арестованы двое
граждан Молдовы, Габриель Стати и Аурен Маринеску, которых власти
Молдовы требуют выдать в Молдову для уголовного преследования в связи
с событиями 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы полагаем, что выдача этих людей в Молдову будет означать поддержку
и оправдание властями Украины тех массовых нарушений прав человека,
который происходят в этой стране.
Украина, которая является членом Совета по правам человека ООН, не может
допустить, чтобы мир воспринимал ее как адвоката жестокости и насилия по отношению к инакомыслящим. Выдвигая свою кандидатуру в качестве возможного
участника Совета ООН по правам человека, Украина обязалась в своих уважать положения Всеобщей Декларации прав человека, избегать политики двойных стандартов при оценке ситуации.
Являясь представителем Восточной Европы в этом важном международном органе, Украина не должна хранить молчание при массовых нарушениях прав человека в одном из соседних государств.
Мы призываем органы власти Украины осудить массовые нарушения прав человека в Молдове, которые происходили и продолжают происходить после 7 апреля 2009 года, а также инициировать рассмотрение ситуации в Молдове на ближайшей сессии Совета ООН по правам человека.
Мы обращаемся ко всем органам власти Украины не предпринимать никаких действий, которые могут быть расценены как прямое или косвенное одобрение действиям властей Молдовы.
Мы обращаемся к органам власти Молдовы предпринять немедленные меры для прекращения практики пыток, массовых арестов и суммарных судебных разбирательств в связи с событиями в Кишинеу 7 апреля 2009 года.
Мы также требуем от властей Молдовы незамедлительно и тщательно расследовать любую информацию о пытках, произвольных арестах и нарушениях прав задержанных.
Мы обращаемся к международным организациям выступить с незамедлительным и решительным осуждением массового нарушения прав человека в Молдове.
Председатель правления Украинского Хельсинского союза
по правам человека
Аркадий Бущенко
Исполнительный директор
Украинского Хельсинского союза
по правам человека
Владимир Яворский
-----------------------------------
Stirea despre aceasta declaratie o gasiti in original, in limba ucraineana daca dati click pe Read More:
УНIАН
[16.04.2009 20:36]
http://human-rights.unian.net/ukr/detail/190474
Правозахисники закликають припинити порушення прав людини у Молдові
Українська Гельсінська спілка з прав людини виражає своє занепокоєння у зв`язку з масовими грубими порушеннями прав людини після подій, що сталися в Кишиневі 7 квітня 2009 року.
Про це йдеться у тексті заяви УГСПЛ, переданої агентству УНІАН.
«Масові арешти, в основному молодих людей, застосування тортур до затриманих, зникнення людей, засудження без належної процедури, без можливості захищатися, під безперервним тиском з боку поліції – все це не можна назвати заходами по запобіганню безладам», - говориться у заяві.
Як стало відомо УГСПЛ, двоє затриманих в ході масових арештів померли від тортур, і у правозахисників немає інформації, що ведеться розслідування цих злочинів і винні будуть покарані.
Також, за даними правозахисників, сотні людей були засуджені за адміністративні правопорушення, не отримавши ні часу, ні можливості підготувати свій захист; сотні демонстрантів були арештовані, при цьому офіційні дані в рази відрізняються від тих, які надають громадські організації; шестеро людей зникли безслідно.
Українські правозахисники заявляють, що у них «немає підстав не довіряти цим даним, особливо на фоні численних рішень Європейського суду з прав людини, які встановлювали відповідальність Молдови за ту практику порушень прав людини, яка в ці дні набула концентрованого і масового характеру».
УГСПЛ також стурбована поспішними заявами про політичну змову, яка нібито лежить в основі подій 7 квітня. «Це створює для затриманих ще більший ризик піддатися тортурам і жорстокому поводженню в поліції через природні спроби влади знайти докази такої змови», - йдеться у тексті заяви українських правозахисників.
Крім того, як повідомляв УНІАН, 9 квітня ц. р. в аеропорту Одеси співробітники міліції, СБУ, прикордонної служби затримали двох громадян Молдови – Габріела СТАТІ та Аурена МАРИНЕСКУ, які підозрюються в організації масових заворушень у Кишиневі. 16 квітня, за повідомленням Генпрокуратури, підозрюваних в організації заворушень в Кишиневі екстрадували з України.
«Видача цих людей до Молдови означає підтримку і виправдання українською владою тих масових порушень прав людини, яка відбуваються в цій країні. Україна, яка є членом Ради з прав людини ООН, не може допустити, щоб світ сприймав її як адвоката жорстокості і насильства по відношенню до інакодумців», - заявляє Українська Гельсінська спілка з прав людини.
Правозахисники закликають органи влади України засудити масові порушення прав людини в Молдові, які відбувалися і продовжують відбуватися після 7 квітня 2009 року, а також ініціювати розгляд ситуації в Молдові на найближчій сесії Ради ООН з прав людини. Також правозахисники звертаються до української влади з проханням не робити жодних дій, які можуть бути розцінені як пряме або непряме схвалення дій молдовської влади.
«Ми звертаємося до органів влади Молдови зробити негайні заходи для припинення практики тортур, масових арештів і сумарних судових розглядів у зв`язку з подіями в Кишиневі 7 квітня 2009 року. Ми також вимагаємо від влади Молдови негайно і ретельно розслідувати будь-яку інформацію про тортури, довільні арешти і порушення прав затриманих. Ми звертаємося до міжнародних організацій виступити з негайним і рішучим осудом масового порушення прав людини в Молдові», - йдеться у тексті заяви УГСПЛ.
Încă o familie îndurerată îşi înmormântează copilul
JURNAL DE CHISINAU
Vineri, 17 aprilie 2009, 11:28
11:28 // Încă o familie îndurerată îşi înmormântează copilul
Eugen Ţapu, cel de-al treilea tânăr despre care se spune că a fost omorât în bătaie după protestele violente din 7 aprilie, va fi înmormântat sâmbătă, 18 aprilie, la Soroca.
Primarul or. Soroca, Victor Său, a declarat pentru Info-Prim Neo că tatăl lui Eugen, Andrei Ţapu, a fost chemat la 16 aprilie la Chişinău pentru a lua cadavrul tânărului de la morgă. Tatăl băiatului este singurul care a reuşit să-l vadă pe Eugen, care a fost adus acasă într-un sicriu sigilat. El i-a spus primarului că trupul neînsufleţit era într-o stare avansată de putrefacţie. „Îl mâncau viermii”, a spus tatăl îndurerat. De asemenea, Andrei Ţapu susţine că pe trupul fiului său a văzut urme de bătăi.
În certificatul de deces figurează data de 7 aprilie. La morgă tatălui i s-a spus că tânărul s-ar fi spânzurat cu şireturile de la încălţăminte. Familia crede, însă, că Eugen a fost ucis în bătaie de poliţie. Avea 26 de ani.
„Este o tragedie mare în oraş”, a spus primarul de Soroca. „ Eugen era un tânăr vesel şi energic. Era sportiv, juca rugby la Chişinău. Îl cunoştea tot oraşul”, a mai spus Victor Său.
Anterior, presa a scris despre alţi doi tineri care au murit după ce au fost maltrataţi de către poliţie în urma acţiunilor de protest de la Parlament şi Preşedinţie.
Alexandru Tănase, avocatul familiei Ţapu a declarat pentru Info-Prim Neo că va începe procedura de judecată internă după sărbătorile de Paşti, solicitând deschiderea unei anchete. „Noi ne vom judeca cu Guvernul R. Moldova, care este obligat în baza Convenţiei Europene a Drepturilor Omului şi în baza Constituţiei R. Moldova să asigure dreptul la viaţă a cetăţenilor săi. Este puţin probabil ca un băiat de 26 ani, sportiv, să se sinucidă”, a spus Tănase.
„Familia este în drept să tragă la răspundere Guvernul R. Moldova şi să obţină compensaţii atât morale, cât şi materiale”, a mai s pus avocatul. Potrivit lui, dacă nu vor obţine câştig de cauză în R. Moldova, vor formula o cerere la Curtea Europeană Drepturilor Omului. (IPN)
Vineri, 17 aprilie 2009, 11:28
11:28 // Încă o familie îndurerată îşi înmormântează copilul
Eugen Ţapu, cel de-al treilea tânăr despre care se spune că a fost omorât în bătaie după protestele violente din 7 aprilie, va fi înmormântat sâmbătă, 18 aprilie, la Soroca.
Primarul or. Soroca, Victor Său, a declarat pentru Info-Prim Neo că tatăl lui Eugen, Andrei Ţapu, a fost chemat la 16 aprilie la Chişinău pentru a lua cadavrul tânărului de la morgă. Tatăl băiatului este singurul care a reuşit să-l vadă pe Eugen, care a fost adus acasă într-un sicriu sigilat. El i-a spus primarului că trupul neînsufleţit era într-o stare avansată de putrefacţie. „Îl mâncau viermii”, a spus tatăl îndurerat. De asemenea, Andrei Ţapu susţine că pe trupul fiului său a văzut urme de bătăi.
În certificatul de deces figurează data de 7 aprilie. La morgă tatălui i s-a spus că tânărul s-ar fi spânzurat cu şireturile de la încălţăminte. Familia crede, însă, că Eugen a fost ucis în bătaie de poliţie. Avea 26 de ani.
„Este o tragedie mare în oraş”, a spus primarul de Soroca. „ Eugen era un tânăr vesel şi energic. Era sportiv, juca rugby la Chişinău. Îl cunoştea tot oraşul”, a mai spus Victor Său.
Anterior, presa a scris despre alţi doi tineri care au murit după ce au fost maltrataţi de către poliţie în urma acţiunilor de protest de la Parlament şi Preşedinţie.
Alexandru Tănase, avocatul familiei Ţapu a declarat pentru Info-Prim Neo că va începe procedura de judecată internă după sărbătorile de Paşti, solicitând deschiderea unei anchete. „Noi ne vom judeca cu Guvernul R. Moldova, care este obligat în baza Convenţiei Europene a Drepturilor Omului şi în baza Constituţiei R. Moldova să asigure dreptul la viaţă a cetăţenilor săi. Este puţin probabil ca un băiat de 26 ani, sportiv, să se sinucidă”, a spus Tănase.
„Familia este în drept să tragă la răspundere Guvernul R. Moldova şi să obţină compensaţii atât morale, cât şi materiale”, a mai s pus avocatul. Potrivit lui, dacă nu vor obţine câştig de cauză în R. Moldova, vor formula o cerere la Curtea Europeană Drepturilor Omului. (IPN)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)